News Center Understand customer needs and strive for excellence in quality, delivery, service, and environmental responsibility
AMELH6060S-3R3MT: Measured Thermal & Current Data
Date: 2026-01-22 12:48:59 Source: Browse: 0

Background & Part Overview

AMELH6060S-3R3MT: Measured Thermal & Current Data

Part electrical and thermal summary

Point: The device is a 0606-ish package resistor-style power element with a nominal resistance value near 3.3 mΩ and rated working voltage per the family.

Evidence: Datasheet lists nominal R, rated power, and thermal path through top copper and bottom pad.

Explanation: Key datasheet values targeted for validation are RDC (ohms), Vdrop at high current, and packaged thermal paths (top-surface conduction and bottom pad to PCB). Package land pattern and exposed pad size strongly affect RθJA and board-level heating.

Why measured thermal data and high current testing matter

Point: Datasheet Rθ and package thermal specs are baseline but do not capture board-level variables that drive failure modes.

Evidence: In practice, overheating and derating occur when PCB copper, vias, and TI interfaces are insufficient.

Explanation: Measured thermal data show real ΔT vs. I and reveal nonlinearities, enabling continuous-current translation, derating curves, and reliability margins to be defined for the actual assembly rather than relying solely on bench datasheet numbers.

Test Setup & Measurement Methodology

Test rig, instrumentation & calibration

Accurate characterization requires precision sources and calibrated thermal sensors. Recommended instruments include a precision current source (±0.1% or better), 4-wire voltage measurement, type‑T thermocouples or 4‑wire RTDs on the package surface, and an IR camera for mapping.

Pro Tip: Place thermocouples directly on the package surface at consistent locations, use thin thermal interface material where appropriate, and log at ≥1 Hz for steady-state capture.

Test protocols, conditions & reporting format

Define steady-state and pulsed regimes, ambient control, and reporting units. Use controlled ambient (23–25°C), DUT mounted to representative PCB, current sweeps in defined steps (e.g., 0.5–1 A increments), and soak until ΔT change

Report I, Vdrop, power (I²R or I×Vdrop), Tsurface/Tjunction estimates, ΔT, and derived Rθ values in clear SI/US unit pairs.

Measured Thermal Results (steady-state & transient)

Steady-state temperature rise vs. current

Plot ΔT (surface minus ambient) against current to extract slope-derived RθJA. Linear regions allow RθJA = ΔT / Pdiss where Pdiss is measured power; nonlinear rise at high dissipation indicates spreading limits.

4A8A12A
Delta T (°C)

Figure: DeltaT vs I Visualization (Conceptual Trend)

Transient response and time constants

Short-pulse heating reveals thermal capacitance and τ (time constant). Record rise/decay curves for pulses (e.g., 100 ms–10 s) and fit to single- or dual‑exponential models to extract τ.

[Figure: Transient rise/decay curves and fitted time constants visualization]

Measured Current Handling & Electrical Performance

Voltage drop & power dissipation trends

Vdrop vs. I is near‑ohmic at modest currents but can shift with temperature. Measured Vdrop = I×Rmeas where Rmeas rises slightly with temperature. Plot Vdrop vs. I and overlay predicted temperature using steady-state Rθ to verify margin at design currents.

Observed limits & failure modes

Watch for thermal runaway indicators and mechanical stress at high current. Typical signs include accelerating ΔT for small I increases, rising contact resistance, and solder‑fillet heating. Capture diagnostic logs to define shutdown or derating thresholds.

Design Implications & PCB Integration Guidance

Thermal management strategies for AMELH6060S-3R3MT

PCB copper and vias dominate board-level thermal performance. Increasing top/bottom copper area and adding thermal vias reduces ΔT per watt. Use thermal pad with multiple vias to internal planes; doubling top copper area typically reduces ΔT by ~20–30%.

Parameter Value / Notes
Ambient 23–25°C, still air
Current sweep 0.5–12 A, 1 A steps
Soak Until ΔT
Sensors Type‑T TC on package surface, IR map

Application Example & Actionable Checklist

Example design calculation

For a 8 A target with measured Rmeas = 3.5 mΩ:
Pdiss = I²R = 8² × 0.0035 = 0.224 W
With measured RθJA ≈ 143°C/W, ΔT ≈ 32°C
Tjunction = Tamb + 32°C.

If Tamb = 25°C and Tj,max = 125°C, margin is ample.

Pre-production verification checklist

  • Re-run steady-state test on final assembled board
  • IR imaging of hotspots under full load
  • Solder fillet temperature inspection
  • Worst-case Vdrop measurement
  • Final sign-off by thermal and reliability engineers

Summary & Key Takeaways

Measured testing indicates a clear ΔT vs. I relationship and predictable Vdrop behavior. For practical designs, combine measured Rθ, I²R losses, and thermal time constants to size copper and vias.

  • Measured ΔT vs. I lets engineers derive board-level Rθ for reliable operation.
  • Transient characterization sets safe pulse widths and duty cycles.
  • Combine Vdrop/I measurements with thermal vias for PCB optimization.
  • Validate with IR imaging on final production-grade boards.

FAQ

How does AMELH6060S-3R3MT affect continuous current rating? +
Answer: Continuous rating depends on measured Rθ on your PCB and actual Rmeas at temperature. Use Pdiss = I²R to compute ΔT = Rθ×Pdiss and set I such that Tjunction stays below target with your margin. Validate on assembled boards under worst-case ambient and airflow.
What steady-state test conditions are recommended for AMELH6060S-3R3MT? +
Answer: Use controlled ambient (≈23–25°C), 4‑wire V/I measurement, thermocouple on package surface, current sweep with 1 A steps, and soak until ΔT stabilizes (
How should thermal data inform PCB copper sizing for high current? +
Answer: Scale copper area based on measured board Rθ: increasing copper and adding thermal vias reduces ΔT per watt. Use the measured ΔT at a reference copper area to calculate the multiplier required to meet your ΔT budget, then validate with prototype thermal mapping.

Key Measurement Points (Empirical Data)

I (A) Vdrop (mV) P (W) ΔT (°C) Thermal Load Visualization
4 14 0.056 8
8 28 0.224 32
12 42 0.504 68